I was playing this game in 2004 and Rome 1 in 2004 and I could decide who to love more. in 2004 KOH1 battles almost looked like a total war. 2010, 2012, ect, could be still considered a good game, but it came 18 years later with same old stuff, diplomacy for a 2022 game, totally suck, was good back then in 2004, but now, it's just bad. If this game would came out as it is couple years after the first one 2008. _ Man.F this bs review, but i would tell you this. UI for buildings is a disaster, u don't know what you build where, just through some small circles that will eventually change their color, something like grey, greyed out and grey bluish -battles totally s the same battle system from koH1 invented in 2004 in a game of 2022 -The RTS camera is very bad one, you can’t zoom out enough to control your army well. In this game? They just merged everything into books. In the first one, the more you fight, the more exp and you gain levels. They streamlined this game so much: -no more spies that can be recruited by the enemy as a general or a bishop -marshals, no longer will gain skills based on experience, even if he will fought 10000 battles. I waited years for this sequel to come out and.i can tell you this: sadly, but I consider this game a mediocre one at most. I waited years for this sequel to come out and.i I just loved KoH1, so perfect for his time, one of my favourite strategy game of all time. I just loved KoH1, so perfect for his time, one of my favourite strategy game of all time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |